Democrat/Republican X: Bipartisan

Now that he’s THE MAN, Democrat shows Republican how it’s done!!
Directed by Jeff Hadick, Written by John T. Kramer, Starring Aaron Sjoholm as Democrat and Shawn Girvan as Republican.

Duration : 0:0:53


[youtube EAm14CvI7k8]

25 Responses to “Democrat/Republican X: Bipartisan”

  • noot68:

    Wow these are great …
    Wow these are great !!!

  • CDRR81:

    HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! …
    HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! 0:44

  • SENTRY000:

    “where i could get …
    “where i could get any troops?”

    Ask Obama he wants to send 40k there!

  • jadedrakerider:

    HighTyro05- Be fair …
    HighTyro05- Be fair. The D’s only just got their filibuster proof majority, and there are more nuances than just D’s v. R’s.

    Personally, I don’t like either party. But now the D’s have their turn to mess things up, we’ll see what they do with it.

  • HighTyro05:

    The “D’s” have a …
    The “D’s” have a majority in the house and they still cant decide what the they want to do. Maybe they can settle it over an abortion

  • tresdizz:

    ask the dead …
    ask the dead soldiers family.

  • jadedrakerider:

    hahahaha!
    That …

    hahahaha!
    That certainly is the state of our current bipartisanship. Doesn’t help that the R’s and stonewalling the D’s at every turn.

  • privateworldofwarft:

    All well. Lol we …
    All well. Lol we can still be firends. Was a long time ago.

  • cogar48:

    Lol I said I love …
    Lol I said I love you and you said cool wanna be friends and that day my computer got a virus and wouldn’t boot again.

  • privateworldofwarft:

    Darfur has a …
    Darfur has a smaller army and we can get world support. It would be easier to invade them. Most people have a problem when you justified starting the war on just because Saddam ruled with an iron fist. When the real reason was to get the Weapons of mass destruction.

    When our military could have been used to get real threats. Like Iran or north kerao.

    I guess we are stuck there.

  • cjla1987:

    Well, I think we …
    Well, I think we are agreeing with something at least buddy. This is what I get a lot from Democrats. They either want to get rid of all the bad people on the Earth or none of them. What kind of dumb idea is that? It’s like cures with diseases. We cannot tackle all kinds of cancer, but some we can. Just like the cancer that we tackled (Saddam Hussein) there are other stronger cancers (Darfur, & Rwanda) that will be harder to tackle.

  • privateworldofwarft:

    Well i am just …
    Well i am just saying the republicans don’t seem honest to me. There are so many oppressive governments. Using that logic we should take them all out. We can’t take all out thats crazy! It would be a world war! But there are countrys that are really really bad compared to others. Darfur which is under going massive genocide. That makes Saddam look like childs play.I agree that at least one got one bad guy out but out of like 100 tho! Its the reason why we want in that brothers me that is all.

  • cjla1987:

    Hey! Do you want to …
    Hey! Do you want to remove the Chinese government tomorrow? WHat kind of dumb idea is that? You either get rid of all the genocides or none of them. We gor rid of a dictator. That is a good things! Period! Cheers for Bush! Period! The moral net was amazing! But you seem to be bothered by that. Whatever the reason we went there, what? We gor rid of them. Hey, you MUST agree with me: it is a stupid idea to say, “you either get rid of all injustices or none of them” do you concur?

  • privateworldofwarft:

    Saddam Hussein Yes …
    Saddam Hussein Yes it was a good thing but there are a lot more oppressive governments we could take out.What you say is really untrue The republicans are the ones that dont want to fight for anyone else.You are just covering your own republican since bush made a mistake.You republicans don’t want to stop the genocide in darfur.You are a double standard republican. Democrats more then willing to fight for other people but republicans pick and choose.Only fight if it benefits them politically

  • cjla1987:

    I think we are …
    I think we are shifting from here. Look, this video clearly shows that it is a burden to Democrats to fight for others. Whatever the reason is, the fact is that what Democrats cannot imagine themselves doing, they cannot imagine others doing. If entering Iraq was a mistake, that is a seperate issue. And yet, you haven’t answered my question, was getting rid of Saddam Hussein good yes/ no? I am talking about the moral net.

  • privateworldofwarft:

    Not to mention that …
    Not to mention that bush didn’t do anything special. His goal was to arrest Saddam for construction of weapons of mass destruction! Not because he was a dictator. So he was not doing it from the iraqs. That came latter on when the republicans tired to cover up there for making such a big mistakes. You are so stuck on the republican dust you can’t see there mistakes! Everyone agrees that this took away too much attention that countrys that do have nuclear weapons.

  • privateworldofwarft:

    “thank you note to …
    “thank you note to Bush” I am not writing a thank you note to a person that invaded a country by mistake and did not even listen to his commanders when they said they needed more troops!.

    “to all of our soldiers” I would write a thank you letter to them. I feel sorry that had such bad leadership and bad appointed generals from the bush admin. Its a brave thing to fight in a other country far away. When they will need to invade iran next. Sorry troops:) Could have been just two countrys!

  • privateworldofwarft:

    He did compaign but …
    He did compaign but didn’t say keeping troops in iraq was off the table. Obama saw the security report and figured out it would makes things worse if we leave. So he just followed the bush treaty. There is a democracy there sort of.
    Yes what he did was good for humanity for the LONG term. A lot of iraqys died during the invasion. a lot people can make a counter argument. The goal was to make the world safer for Americans not iraqs! We should have invaded iran. They do have nuclear weapons.

  • cjla1987:

    Wait, wait, wait… …
    Wait, wait, wait….Didn’t Obama planned to get almost all troops out of Iraq? That was what he was saying during his campaign? Bush had the same idea but he wanted to establish Democracy first. But in any event, I want to ask you something, what Bush did was very good for humanity. He got rid of Hussein, doesn’t that mean any to you? If it does, then I guess you better send a thank you note to Bush and to all of our soldiers, wouldn’t you say?

  • privateworldofwarft:

    “Obama is: to take …
    “Obama is: to take Americans out of Iraq because he doesn’t care about Iraqis. Isn’t this true? ”
    Nope, he is just following your republican plan. THat was deal set up with the iraq from the bush days. So I guess republicans don’t give a rats about the Iraqis either. Obama going to leave 50,000 long term troops there anyway. So you are just saying out of your like most reps.

    There been republicans raise tax 90% back in the 50′S!!The rich got us into this mess in the first place!

  • cjla1987:

    My point exactly! …
    My point exactly! Hahaha My point exactly! That is it! That is it…. This video reflects your ideas. Democrats fight for economic inequality (they want honestly earned money taken away from people) while Republicans removed a horrible dictator (Saddam Husein), or tell me, do you given a rat’s about others? Because that is what the idea of Obama is: to take Americans out of Iraq because he doesn’t care about Iraqis. Isn’t this true?

  • privateworldofwarft:

    Looks like you dont …
    Looks like you dont give a ratsass about Americans. You give more of a about some terrorist.

  • privateworldofwarft:

    “obama wants to get …
    “obama wants to get the troops out of iraq? ”
    What are you hard in the head? Obama is not pulling out. He is just following the same plan as your hero MR.BUSH.

    There was a treaty to keep troops there for another 3 years. Well thats what he is doing. Would nt make differance who is president. WE like fighting for AMERICANS more then forgien people THat because we believe our tax dollars should go towards improving our OWN nation instead of otherS!

  • cjla1987:

    Ohh wow! you are …
    Ohh wow! you are actually the first democrats that says that…hey…this video is based on your ideas….this video says that it is a burden for democrats to fight for others..i am talking specifically about the iraq war…why do you think they wanna get out?! because they do not want to fight for others…or tell me..what is the real reason obama wants to get the troops out of iraq?

  • privateworldofwarft:

    What are you …
    What are you talking about? Democrats always fght for others. In different countrys. They just didnt like the way bush did it. He sent too little troops and had goals way to large for just two terms.

    Not all democrats are anti- iraq war. I am a democrat and i support both wars. Don’t be a brat we would dye for america if we needed too. Iraq is more of a first line of defense. WHich we have enough troops right now and back then to do a better job.

Leave a Reply